For regulators

For regulators

Evidence for national gambling and payments regulators.

Regulators

The fear

A blocking order you cannot aim, and a procurement file you cannot defend on review.

The answer

Attribution to the acquiring BIN, documented by transaction, and reproducible from the pack itself.

The obligation you enforce

What you cannot see

A blocking order aimed at a domain expires the moment the domain does. The operator registers another one the same day, points it at the same cashier, and the order is spent.

Payment blocking is the instrument with teeth, and it is the one your file cannot currently aim: you would have to name the acquiring institution, and nothing in a public investigation reaches that field.

Channelling estimates measure what licensed operators lost. They do not identify who is banking the operator that took it, which is the fact an enforcement decision has to rest on.

What we supply

A per-transaction attribution to the acquiring institution serving an unlicensed operator in your market, reproducible from the pack without our narration.

A record built to survive review: every artefact hashed at collection, every handling logged, the notice date and any reply carried with the finding.

Cross-border usability — the same pack is intelligible to a payments supervisor, a scheme compliance team and a counterpart authority in the market where the acquirer sits.

How it is commissioned

Three ways to commission the work: a named set of targets, a market kept current, or a programme funded jointly.

How engagements work →