For financial institutions

For financial institutions

Portfolio evidence for banks, EMIs, acquirers and PSPs.

Financial institutions

The fear

Joint liability and scheme assessments on merchants you cannot see through.

The answer

A screening list of confirmed BINs and descriptors, with API access on engagement, refreshed as operators rotate.

The obligation you carry

What you cannot see

An illegal operator does not need to move dirty money through you. It needs a clean-looking merchant account inside your portfolio, or inside a partner's, and it will pay full card fees to keep it.

Underwriting sees the application. Monitoring sees the transaction data the merchant generates. Neither sees the storefront a customer actually reaches at the moment of deposit, which is where the mismatch is visible.

The same blindness applies one layer out. Traffic reaching you through an orchestrator, a payment facilitator or a partner PSP arrives already aggregated, and the descriptor is the only thing you get to read.

The tools to decline, to offboard and to escalate exist. The visibility to aim them does not.

What we supply

A screening list of confirmed BINs and descriptor strings, with API access on engagement, refreshed as operators rotate shells and cashiers.

Portfolio and partner-chain exposure: which of the merchants settling through you or through a downstream partner is delivering a vertical it never declared.

A dossier per confirmed merchant on attach, sufficient for an offboarding decision and for the file you will have to show a scheme afterwards.

How it is commissioned

Three ways to commission the work: a named set of targets, a market kept current, or a programme funded jointly.

How engagements work →